>>>> my test show that I am now about 400 percent faster than I was before
>>>>using
>>>> several different benchmarks.
>>>
>>> What was "before" ??
>>>
>>> Pete...
>>
>> Pete:
>>
>> Duh... 100 percent. :-)
>>
>
>I think that has to win a prize as the most unhelpful answer to a question
>given this year ;->
>
>--
>Robin

I must agree.  Since Pete had dared the bandwidth to ask what I was
interested in myself, namely, what was the machine before most likely, I am
still left hanging too.

Tedd, spare us the grief. What was the hardware before?

Robert Covington