>>>> my test show that I am now about 400 percent faster than I was before >>>>using >>>> several different benchmarks. >>> >>> What was "before" ?? >>> >>> Pete... >> >> Pete: >> >> Duh... 100 percent. :-) >> > >I think that has to win a prize as the most unhelpful answer to a question >given this year ;-> > >-- >Robin I must agree. Since Pete had dared the bandwidth to ask what I was interested in myself, namely, what was the machine before most likely, I am still left hanging too. Tedd, spare us the grief. What was the hardware before? Robert Covington