I think the clickable URL is important too. You could however, leave out
the www if you want. That will depend on dns records, but in your case,
tedd, it looks like your site will take http://sperling.com just fine.

Please leave the html out of your email though!!! IE and Netscape both
let you generate an HTML email (I think they even default to that
capability), but I agree with those who think it's bad manners.

PB

tedd wrote:
>  In fact, I been wondering
> now about the redundancy of always having to place a http://www. in
> front of my URL. Maybe I'll shorten my sig to sperling.com (as
> below). But, then on the other hand, I want people to be able to
> click on my sig to get to my site. Hmmm.
> 
> I have seen emails that incorporate some HTML code, but I haven't
> mastered that type of sig yet. But, then again maybe that will only
> add to volume that's sent.,