rc:

>I think your algorithm is simply a little whacked, and drawing conclusions
>from it is a bit of a stretch.  They just clump up and sort of  v-out on
>the way to the edge. I will not be awarding you the Nobel Beaks Prize by
>any means.

Whacked???  Well... programs do tend to reflect their writers. I 
could/should put more flash in it to make it look better, but the 
idea is still there.

As for the "bit of a stretch" maybe I see a bit further than you. The 
simplest solution is usually the right one. What's the name of that 
theorem -- axiom's razor or something' like that?

However, I do like your Nobel Beaks Prize thing -- LOL

tedd
-- 
http://sperling.com