>rc:
>
>>I think your algorithm is simply a little whacked, and drawing conclusions
>>from it is a bit of a stretch.  They just clump up and sort of  v-out on
>>the way to the edge. I will not be awarding you the Nobel Beaks Prize by
>>any means.
>
>Whacked???  Well... programs do tend to reflect their writers. I
>could/should put more flash in it to make it look better, but the
>idea is still there.
>
>As for the "bit of a stretch" maybe I see a bit further than you.

Mebbe you'n don't. I have quality mental optics. Somewhere.

>The
>simplest solution is usually the right one.

It is, if it is right. Sometimes it is the best that one can think up
though. :)


What's the name of that
>theorem -- axiom's razor or something' like that?

Occam'em Sock'em Robots.

I digress.  Go back to Alcatraz and let me go back to the cave.

rc