Peter Bancroft wrote:
> 
(snip)
> 
> You could implement this as an array.
> With some of the array elements being the address of the links.
> 
This seems to me to be a bad suggestion. The beauty of the linked list is that
you don't have to worry about free records, remaining space (you have the
whole heap basically at your disposal), and other administration.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I'd sooner die than code a linked list using
anything but handles.

PB